![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhrUFtlmTFT9KqSE8wBJEkv1183LWpOqHdGZ2iDVIEkTp048zwei5kSPTKXjiAMbo28IoTiKIMJqNuof-NmqXw7C2_vIKM20pTv5fOK3j22Dggu9ih24NIBgVhxy_SJdzX7b7radoo7gQk/s200/clay-molding.jpg)
The learner of today is like a lump of clay. The learner is like this raw, unshaped form that is not yet aesthetically pleasing but through outside instruction and guidance as well as a learner's own internal desires and goals, the clay can be shaped into a masterpiece. Siemen's article explains connectivism as a way to "provide insight into learning skills and tasks needed for learners to flourish in a digital era". I was hesitant to use clay as an analogy because it has little relation to our technologically advanced world but he also goes on to describe learning as "a lasting charged state brought about as a result of experiences and interactions with context or other people". A lump of clay will have gone through several transformations before turning into a final product. Learners are always being molded and shaped through their interactions in their own minds and the ones they engage in through the various networks available to them.
I initially struggled to wrap my head around Siemen's theory because I couldn't think of a time where learning ever lacked "connectivity". Listening to Siemen explain in his video of The Changing Nature of Knowledge helped clear a few things up for me. Technology is changing so rapidly in our world today that I agree that we have "to continue to stay current...as knowledge changes" and that we have to utilize our "network of knowledge" because "the network becomes the learning". Students will come into our classrooms with a variety of networks - home, family, friends, social, digital - to ignore these vital networks and not incorporate into the classroom would be a huge disservice to our students. Technology will only continue to advance and we must stay as current and connected as possible.
Nathan,
ReplyDeletePerhaps you could push your analogy further to find a way to include the collaboration involved in the connectivity. For example, if the clay becomes a vase, it not only has benefited from the input of the creator, but gives back in various ways to the "audience" with the various types of flowers it holds for their delight. (Just a thought). :-)
Dr. Burgos